Secure.gov sites use HTTPS
A lock (Lock Locked padlock) or https:// indicates you have actually securely connected to the.gov site. Share sensitive info only on authorities, safe websites.
- About - The Chief law officer
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
Utilities
- About About
Our Work
- Contact the Division Contact the Division
Report an Infraction
- Cases and Matters
- Press Room Press Room
Videos
Publications
- Employment Opportunities Employment Opportunities
Experienced Professionals
Attorney General ´ s Honors Program
Volunteer and Paid Student Internship Programs
- Civil Liberty FOIA Civil Liberty FOIA
Emmett Till Act/Cold Case Memoranda
- En español
- About - title=" About" About
- The Attorney general of the United States
- Organizational Chart
- Budget & Performance
- History
- Privacy Program
- title=" News" News
- Press Releases
- Speeches
- Videos
- Photo Galleries
- Blogs
- Podcasts
- title=" Guidance & Resources" Resources
- Guidance Documents
- Forms
- Publications
- Information for Victims in Large Cases
- Justice Manual
- Business and Contracts
- Employment
- Why Justice?
- Benefits
- DOJ Vacancies
- Legal Careers at DOJ
- Our Offices
- Find Help
- Contact Us
Breadcrumb
1. Justice.gov
2. Civil Rights Division
3. The Fair Housing Act
The Fair Housing Act
- Facebook
- X.
- LinkedIn.
- Email
The Fair Housing Act, 42 U.S.C. 3601 et seq., prohibits discrimination by direct service providers of housing, such as property owners and realty companies as well as other entities, such as municipalities, banks or other loan provider and property owners insurance provider whose discriminatory practices make housing not available to persons since of:
race or color.
faith.
sex.
nationwide origin.
familial status, or.
special needs.
In cases involving discrimination in mortgage loans or home improvement loans, the Department may submit fit under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act. The Department brings cases where there is evidence of a pattern or practice of discrimination or where a denial of rights to a group of individuals raises an issue of basic public significance. Where force or risk of force is used to reject or interfere with fair housing rights, the Department of Justice might institute criminal proceedings. The Fair Housing Act likewise supplies procedures for managing individual complaints of discrimination. Individuals who think that they have been victims of an illegal housing practice, may submit a complaint with the Department of Housing and Urban Development [HUD] or submit their own suit in federal or state court. The Department of Justice brings matches on behalf of individuals based on recommendations from HUD.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Race or Color
One of the main goals of the Fair Housing Act, when Congress enacted it in 1968, was to restrict race discrimination in sales and leasings of housing. Nevertheless, more than 30 years later on, race discrimination in housing continues to be a problem. Most of the Justice Department's pattern or practice cases involve claims of race discrimination. Sometimes, housing suppliers attempt to camouflage their discrimination by giving false details about accessibility of housing, either stating that nothing was readily available or steering homeseekers to specific locations based upon race. Individuals who receive such false details or misdirection may have no understanding that they have been victims of discrimination. The Department of Justice has brought many cases declaring this type of discrimination based on race or color. In addition, the Department's Fair Housing Testing Program looks for to reveal this sort of surprise discrimination and hold those responsible liable. Most of the mortgage loaning cases brought by the Department under the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act have declared discrimination based upon race or color. Some of the Department's cases have actually likewise alleged that municipalities and other city government entities violated the Fair Housing Act when they rejected authorizations or zoning modifications for housing advancements, or relegated them to predominantly minority communities, since the potential homeowners were expected to be primarily African-Americans.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Religion
The Fair Housing Act forbids discrimination in housing based upon faith. This restriction covers circumstances of overt discrimination against members of a particular faith too less direct actions, such as zoning ordinances developed to restrict using personal homes as a locations of praise. The variety of cases filed since 1968 alleging religious discrimination is small in comparison to a few of the other forbidden bases, such as race or nationwide origin. The Act does include a restricted exception that enables non-commercial housing run by a spiritual organization to reserve such housing to individuals of the exact same faith.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Sex, Including Sexual Harassment
The Fair Housing Act makes it illegal to discriminate in housing on the basis of sex. Recently, the Department's focus in this area has been to challenge sexual harassment in housing. Women, especially those who are bad, and with minimal housing options, typically have little recourse but to tolerate the embarrassment and degradation of unwanted sexual advances or threat having their families and themselves got rid of from their homes. The Department's enforcement program is focused on proprietors who develop an untenable living environment by requiring sexual favors from tenants or by creating a sexually hostile environment for them. In this manner we seek both to get relief for occupants who have actually been dealt with unjustly by a property owner since of sex and also discourage other prospective abusers by making it clear that they can not continue their conduct without facing consequences. In addition, pricing discrimination in mortgage lending might also negatively impact women, especially minority ladies. This type of discrimination is unlawful under both the Fair Housing Act and Equal Credit Opportunity Act.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon National Origin
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination based upon national origin. Such discrimination can be based either upon the nation of an individual's birth or where his or her ancestors come from. Census information suggest that the Hispanic population is the fastest growing segment of our country's population. The Justice Department has actually taken enforcement action versus community federal governments that have actually tried to minimize or restrict the number of Hispanic households that might live in their communities. We have actually taken legal action against lenders under both the Fair Housing Act and the Equal Credit Opportunity Act when they have enforced more rigid underwriting standards on mortgage or made loans on less favorable terms for Hispanic borrowers. The Department has likewise sued lenders for discrimination against Native Americans. Other areas of the nation have experienced an increasing variety of national origin groups within their populations. This includes new immigrants from Southeastern Asia, such as the Hmong, the former Soviet Union, and other portions of Eastern Europe. We have actually done something about it versus personal landlords who have discriminated versus such individuals.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Familial Status
The Fair Housing Act, with some exceptions, restricts discrimination in housing versus households with children under 18. In addition to prohibiting a straight-out rejection of housing to households with children, the Act likewise prevents housing companies from enforcing any unique requirements or conditions on tenants with custody of kids. For example, landlords might not locate households with kids in any single part of a complex, put an unreasonable constraint on the total number of persons who might live in a dwelling, or limit their access to leisure services provided to other occupants. In a lot of circumstances, the changed Fair Housing Act forbids a housing service provider from declining to lease or offer to families with kids. However, some facilities might be designated as Housing for Older Persons (55 years of age). This kind of housing, which satisfies the requirements set forth in the Housing for Older Persons Act of 1995, might run as "senior" housing. The Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) has published guidelines and additional assistance detailing these statutory requirements.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability
The Fair Housing Act prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in all kinds of housing deals. The Act defines individuals with an impairment to imply those individuals with psychological or physical problems that substantially limit several major life activities. The term mental or physical disability may include conditions such as loss of sight, hearing disability, mobility disability, HIV infection, psychological retardation, alcoholism, drug addiction, persistent tiredness, discovering special needs, head injury, and psychological health problem. The term significant life activity may include seeing, hearing, walking, breathing, carrying out manual tasks, caring for one's self, discovering, speaking, or working. The Fair Housing Act also secures individuals who have a record of such a disability, or are considered having such an impairment. Current users of prohibited regulated substances, individuals convicted for prohibited manufacture or distribution of a regulated substance, sex transgressors, and juvenile transgressors are not considered handicapped under the Fair Housing Act, by virtue of that status. The Fair Housing Act manages no protections to individuals with or without disabilities who provide a direct threat to the individuals or residential or commercial property of others. Determining whether somebody presents such a direct danger needs to be made on a customized basis, however, and can not be based upon basic presumptions or speculation about the nature of an impairment. The Division's enforcement of the Fair Housing Act's protections for persons with specials needs has actually focused on 2 major locations. One is insuring that zoning and other guidelines worrying land use are not used to prevent the property choices of these people, consisting of needlessly limiting communal, or gather, residential plans, such as group homes. The second location is guaranteeing that recently constructed multifamily housing is integrated in accordance with the Fair Housing Act's accessibility requirements so that it is available to and functional by individuals with disabilities, and, in specific, those who use wheelchairs. There are other federal statutes that forbid discrimination versus people with disabilities, including the Americans with Disabilities Act, which is imposed by the Disability Rights Section of the Civil Liberty Division.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability Group Homes
Some individuals with disabilities may cohabit in congregate living plans, typically referred to as "group homes." The Fair Housing Act forbids towns and other city government entities from making zoning or land usage choices or executing land use policies that omit or otherwise discriminate against people with disabilities. The Fair Housing Act makes it unlawful--
- To use land use policies or actions that treat groups of persons with disabilities less favorably than groups of non-disabled persons. An example would be a regulation restricting housing for individuals with disabilities or a specific type of special needs, such as psychological health problem, from locating in a specific area, while permitting other groups of unassociated individuals to live together in that location.
- To take action against, or deny an authorization, for a home because of the disability of people who live or would live there. An example would be rejecting a structure authorization for a home because it was intended to supply housing for persons with mental retardation.
- To decline to make sensible accommodations in land usage and zoning policies and procedures where such lodgings may be needed to pay for persons or groups of individuals with impairments a level playing field to use and delight in housing. What makes up an affordable lodging is a case-by-case decision. Not all requested adjustments of rules or policies are reasonable. If a requested adjustment enforces an excessive financial or administrative burden on a regional federal government, or if an adjustment produces an essential alteration in a city government's land use and zoning scheme, it is not a "affordable" accommodation.
Discrimination in Housing Based Upon Disability-- Accessibility Features for New Construction
The Fair Housing Act specifies discrimination in housing versus individuals with disabilities to include a failure "to create and build" particular brand-new multi-family homes so that they are accessible to and functional by persons with specials needs, and especially people who utilize wheelchairs. The Act requires all freshly constructed multi-family residences of four or more units meant for first tenancy after March 13, 1991, to have particular features: an available entryway on an accessible route, available typical and public usage areas, doors adequately broad to accommodate wheelchairs, available paths into and through each dwelling, light switches, electric outlets, and thermostats in available location, supports in bathroom walls to accommodate grab bar installations, and functional cooking areas and restrooms set up so that a wheelchair can maneuver about the space.
Developers, contractors, owners, and architects responsible for the style or building of new multi-family housing might be held responsible under the Fair Housing Act if their structures stop working to meet these style requirements. The Department of Justice has actually brought lots of enforcement actions against those who stopped working to do so. Most of the cases have actually been solved by approval decrees providing a variety of kinds of relief, including: retrofitting to bring inaccessible features into compliance where feasible and where it is not-- alternatives (monetary funds or other construction requirements) that will supply for making other housing units available; training on the accessibility requirements for those associated with the construction process; a mandate that all new housing jobs adhere to the availability requirements, and monetary relief for those hurt by the violations. In addition, the Department has actually sought to promote ease of access through building codes.
