For Christmas I got a fascinating present from a buddy - my very own "best-selling" book.
"Tech-Splaining for Dummies" (fantastic title) bears my name and my photo on its cover, and it has glowing reviews.
Yet it was completely composed by AI, with a few easy triggers about me provided by my buddy Janet.
It's an interesting read, and extremely amusing in parts. But it also meanders rather a lot, and is somewhere in between a self-help book and a stream of anecdotes.
It imitates my chatty style of composing, but it's likewise a bit repetitive, and systemcheck-wiki.de extremely verbose. It might have surpassed Janet's triggers in looking at data about me.
Several sentences start "as a leading technology reporter ..." - cringe - which could have been scraped from an online bio.
There's likewise a strange, repetitive hallucination in the form of my cat (I have no family pets). And there's a metaphor on nearly every page - some more random than others.
There are lots of business online offering AI-book writing services. My book was from BookByAnyone.
When I contacted the chief executive Adir Mashiach, based in Israel, he informed me he had actually offered around 150,000 personalised books, mainly in the US, considering that pivoting from putting together AI-generated travel guides in June 2024.
A paperback copy of your own 240-page long best-seller expenses ₤ 26. The company uses its own AI tools to create them, based upon an open source large language model.
I'm not asking you to purchase my book. Actually you can't - only Janet, who produced it, can buy any additional copies.
There is currently no barrier to anyone creating one in anybody's name, consisting of celebrities - although Mr Mashiach says there are guardrails around violent material. Each book consists of a printed disclaimer stating that it is imaginary, produced by AI, and developed "entirely to bring humour and delight".
Legally, the copyright belongs to the company, however Mr Mashiach stresses that the product is intended as a "personalised gag gift", and the books do not get offered further.
He wishes to expand his variety, generating different categories such as sci-fi, and possibly offering an autobiography service. It's developed to be a light-hearted form of customer AI - selling AI-generated goods to human consumers.
It's also a bit scary if, like me, you write for a living. Not least because it most likely took less than a minute to produce, and it does, certainly in some parts, sound similar to me.
Musicians, authors, artists and stars worldwide have revealed alarm about their work being used to train generative AI tools that then produce comparable content based upon it.
"We ought to be clear, when we are talking about data here, we really mean human developers' life works," states Ed Newton Rex, creator of Fairly Trained, which projects for AI companies to regard creators' rights.
"This is books, this is articles, this is images. It's artworks. It's records ... The whole point of AI training is to learn how to do something and then do more like that."
In 2023 a tune featuring AI-generated voices of Canadian vocalists Drake and The Weeknd went viral on social networks before being pulled from streaming platforms due to the fact that it was not their work and they had not granted it. It didn't stop the track's developer attempting to choose it for a Grammy award. And even though the artists were fake, it was still wildly popular.
"I do not believe the usage of generative AI for innovative purposes must be banned, however I do think that generative AI for these functions that is trained on people's work without authorization must be banned," Mr Newton Rex includes. "AI can be very powerful but let's construct it ethically and relatively."
OpenAI says Chinese competitors utilizing its work for their AI apps
DeepSeek: The Chinese AI app that has the world talking
China's DeepSeek AI shakes industry and damages America's swagger
In the UK some organisations - consisting of the BBC - have actually picked to block AI developers from trawling their online material for training purposes. Others have decided to work together - the Financial Times has partnered with ChatGPT creator OpenAI for instance.
The UK federal government is thinking about an overhaul of the law that would allow AI developers to utilize developers' content on the internet to assist establish their models, unless the rights holders pull out.
Ed Newton Rex explains this as "insanity".
He explains that AI can make advances in areas like defence, healthcare and logistics without trawling the work of authors, reporters and artists.
"All of these things work without going and altering copyright law and messing up the incomes of the country's creatives," he argues.
Baroness Kidron, a crossbench peer in the House of Lords, is likewise strongly versus removing copyright law for AI.
"Creative markets are wealth developers, 2.4 million jobs and an entire lot of pleasure," states the Baroness, who is likewise a consultant to the Institute for Ethics in AI at Oxford University.
"The federal government is undermining one of its finest carrying out industries on the vague pledge of development."
A federal government spokesperson said: "No relocation will be made until we are definitely confident we have a practical strategy that provides each of our goals: increased control for right holders to help them license their content, access to premium material to train leading AI models in the UK, and more openness for best holders from AI designers."
Under the UK government's brand-new AI strategy, a national information library including public information from a vast array of sources will likewise be offered to AI scientists.
In the US the future of federal guidelines to manage AI is now up in the air following President Trump's return to the presidency.
In 2023 Biden signed an executive order that aimed to improve the security of AI with, to name a few things, firms in the sector required to share information of the workings of their systems with the US federal government before they are released.
But this has actually now been reversed by Trump. It stays to be seen what Trump will do rather, users.atw.hu but he is said to want the AI sector to face less regulation.
This comes as a number of suits against AI firms, and particularly against OpenAI, continue in the US. They have actually been secured by everyone from the New york city Times to authors, music labels, and even a comic.
They claim that the AI companies broke the law when they took their content from the internet without their authorization, and mariskamast.net used it to train their systems.
The AI companies argue that their actions fall under "reasonable use" and are therefore exempt. There are a number of elements which can constitute fair usage - it's not a straight-forward meaning. But the AI sector is under increasing scrutiny over how it collects training data and whether it need to be spending for it.
If this wasn't all enough to consider, Chinese AI firm DeepSeek has shaken the sector over the previous week. It became one of the most downloaded free app on Apple's US App Store.
DeepSeek declares that it established its technology for a fraction of the rate of the similarity OpenAI. Its success has raised security issues in the US, and threatens American's present supremacy of the sector.
As for me and a career as an author, I believe that at the minute, if I actually desire a "bestseller" I'll still have to write it myself. If anything, Tech-Splaining for Dummies highlights the present weakness in generative AI tools for larger jobs. It is complete of errors and hallucinations, and it can be rather tough to read in parts since it's so verbose.
But offered how quickly the tech is progressing, I'm not exactly sure the length of time I can remain confident that my substantially slower human writing and editing abilities, are much better.
Register for our Tech Decoded newsletter to follow the most significant developments in global technology, with analysis from BBC correspondents around the globe.
Outside the UK? Sign up here.
